Semi-FRAUD of Barclays' staff is 100% FRAUD!

Re. "To FIRE ALL Barclays' STAFF ..."


Legal Disclaimer: As Barclays Bank has chosen to made UNPRECEDENTED FOR BANKING INDUSTRY decision to stop any communication with me, its customer, about the debts it owns to me (see below), +WITHOUT ANY ATTEMPT, - AND DEFINITELY ANY INTENTION!, - TO PAY THOSE  DEBTS EVER, I am under no legal restrictions to PUBLISH RELATED LETTERS, including  for allowing public, starting from Barclays' shareholders and owners, to contact Barclays' CEOs on their own, if they choose to, and get through the Barclays' FRAUDULENT INFO-WALL its CEOs built for my particular case. 
 
Here is just one UNPRECEDENTED letter of Barclays' CEOs officially sent to my home address several years ago:

Date: 18-Nov-2016, 4:09 PM
From: ian.d******y@barclays.com
Subject: Barclays Executive Office | Our Reference: A3579694
Dear Mr Beloy
 
Further to your recent emails, we have reviewed your case further. We would firstly like to thank you for confirming you have received the Bankers Draft which we issued to you on 13 October. 

Please be assured that the Bankers Draft we have provided can, and should, be deposited into an account with any international bank. Whilst the draft will not expire, some banks may decline to accept the instruction once it has exceeded six months of age. We would therefore request that you deposit the payment as soon as possible to avoid further inconvenience and delay. Although there may be applicable charges applied by your Ukrainian bankers, the draft includes an additional £***** as a gesture of goodwill. We feel any fees levied would be sufficiently covered by this gesture.

It is our position that this payment is the full and final sum due to you by Barclays, as outlined in our previous communications, therefore, as payment has now been executed, you no longer hold a banking relationship with Barclays. As such, we will enter into no further communication with you regarding your claims. All future correspondence will be retained on file but a response will not be provided.

We note further that you continue to make contact current and former employees and persons directly or indirectly associated with Barclays. This is inappropriate conduct and we ask that you immediately stop this. We reserve our right to take legal action against you to prevent further inappropriate contact by you with an invitation to the Court that you meet the legal costs of any action taken against you.
 
Whilst we acknowledge this is not the outcome you have hoped for, we trust that we have relayed our position clearly. 

Yours sincerely

 For and on Behalf of Barclays

 I GUARANTEE 100% IDENTITY OF THIS LETTER,
ORIGINAL OF WHICH CAN BE PRESENTED 

IN THE COURT, IF REQUIRED, AT ANY TIME!

Just three important points:

1. The Barclays' CEOs STOPPED bilateral business relationships with me WITHOUT MY CONSENT AND EVEN ASKING, let alone apologizing for unprecedented 16 YEARS' interruption of their services.

2. The CEOs STOPPED ANY FURTHER COMMUNICATION ABOUT Barclays' DEBT TO ME!

3. By sending me ABSOLUTELY USELESS PIECE OF PAPER (Bankers Draft) that has been IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO USE, including their "generous gesture of goodwill" in it, the CEOs intentionally committed a FRAUD of creating a reason for formal closing the case with the crime of DISTORTING THEIR OFFICIAL BALANCE SHEET FOR YEARS!

 

Reply of my supporters was immediate:

**************************
Date: November 22, 11:26 AM
To: ian.d*****y@barclays.com
From: D**** <b.agreement@bk***>
Re: Your Letter (#A3579694 of November 18, 2016)
Dear Jes Staley, and other CEOs of the Barclays,
In your last official letter to us of November 18 you state the Barclays has paid to Mr Beloy all his money. Moreover, you believe the conflict between Barclays and Beloy is finally settled. That's what you (the Barclays) officially state in the letter. There is, however, one "small" problem, - that is simply not true! And you know that.

Although it took for you almost three months(!) to compile your thoughts about the things your client, who because of you lives at the edge between life and death, asked you to do "immediately", our first response to your intellectual efforts is:
STOP LYING!!! 

In particular, when you say "as payment has now been executed, you no longer hold a banking relationship with Barclays", you generate a DOUBLE LIE! Actually, a HUGE PACK OF LIES!
 

Firstly, how do you know the payment was executed? Have you received a confirmation your check was cashed? No, you haven't. Because it wasn't executed! And will hardly be ever. Simply because it's simply IMPOSSIBLE to cash it in the country of Beloy's destination!!! And you know that perfectly (we informed the Barclays about that in our previous letters). And you also know why it's impossible: The Barclays under YOUR leadership has made the payment impossible to use by choosing the worst possible way for that, - a check, - despite all our advises during last twelve months!
 

Secondly, why you believe Beloy's banking relations with Barclays have ended? Did Mr Beloy tell you that? No, he didn't! The bank's relationship with any client who lawfully opened their accounts may be ended by mutual agreement only. Despite Mr Beloy NEVER broke the law in his life (till facing a need to contact unresponsive Barclays' support service, as its lawyers claim, simultaneously forcing him to break laws in his native country for the last 16 years), at the beginning of the century the Barclays already tried to cancel Beloy's credit cards unilaterally, just at its own wish. And that became a starting point for the whole story.
 

Now the most important issue:
Have you paid ALL your debt to Mr Beloy?
No, you haven't!
By the moment Mr Beloy has NOT received from your Barclays a penny!
So why you are lying?

Today, Jes, it's legally and morally impossible to cancel your financial obligations simply because you are reluctant to return to him your debts! As for your "settlement" you generously priced in $0.00, it hardly can be considered as such at all. Even if you multiply it to all SIXTEEN YEARS of the pleasure to deal with your fruitless support service, it will remain just that, - a ZERO!
In other words, YOU ARE LYING!

 
By the way, what did you mean by saying to Mr Beloy about results of your work "we acknowledge this is not the outcome you have hoped for ..."? What "outcome" you are talking about? He and we have hoped for just one thing: Restoring the justice through BOTH returning Beloy's original deposit AND a fair compensation for your failure to do that during the whole 16 years. You have prevented us to achieve NEITHER thing. Is that the outcome YOU have hoped for?
 

Now about amount of your debt. You say: "It is our position that this payment [your cheque] is the full and final sum due to you by Barclays". Well, it's becomes more and more interesting. But let us start with a simple question to you:
Who authorized the Barclays to start that payment that roughly equals to the sum at Beloy's account? Mr Beloy? No, he didn't!!! And that's a very serious issue!
 

The only lawful order from Mr Beloy with his genuine hand-written signature the Barclays received is the following: "I want you to provide me immediately an access to my savings in your bank AND a fair SETTLEMENT for the Barclays' failure to grant me that access during last 16 years!" (see copy of the most his recent letter mailed to the Barclays by registered post attached). You see the difference?
 

First, Mr Beloy does not appeal to the Barclays for transferring to him his deposit, let alone closing his bank account. Just on the contrary: Mr Beloy asks PERSONALLY YOU, Jes Staley, to RESTORE his Barclay's ACCOUNT!!! In particular, through providing him a valid Visa credit card (photo of his words ATTACHED).

Second, his letter says clearly about BOTH original savings AND SETTLEMENT, - in one sentence!!! And the Barclays' recent letter officially confirms the Beloy's order addressed personally to the Barclays CEO Jes Staley was successfully delivered. You ACCEPTED his order and sent your first check towards any future settlement. Now it's time to complete the settlement! 

Although you might send the money through several checks, you may not disintegrate the order to several parts according to your own wishes. Especially without a proper CONSENT of Mr Beloy. It's illegal! Has he provided the Barclays with his consent for such fractional disintegration of his order, let alone for its free decomposition of YOUR choice? No, he has not!

Similarly, you may not execute financial orders of your clients partly. By default, "accepting a part means accepting the whole in full"!

 
Well, you can choose to not care about reputation of the bank with three hundred years' history at all and refuse to complete the order in full. But legally the order in such case will not be considered as executed one, and your debt to Mr Beloy will remain outstanding anyway. 

The Barclays, however, has ACCEPTED Beloy's order and has started its execution (and your check we are looking at right now is a confirmation of that). Legally, that action is a clear confirmation of Barclays' agreement with Beloy's demands stated in his order in full. 

What is more, your problem with the Barclays' check ("Bankers Draft"), we honestly attempted to discourage you from using in this particular case, is it is valid for unlimited period of time! You also reconfirm that in written by stating "The Draft will not expire". This is the Barclays' promise! And as Mr Beloy cannot cash it properly, - for him it's simply impossible!, - that document is going to be legally valid FOREVER!!! Thus making it for the Barclays PERPETUALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO CANCEL execution of Beloy's order.The Baclays has started it already! And cannot complete the transaction. It simply "stuck" in the middle of the process! Obviously, for its own fault (the client explicitely asked the Barclays not to do that, but you arrogantly ignored his appeals as usual).
You also did not attach any cover letter to your check, which might raise any our doubts you did precisely what Mr Beloy was ordered you to do. As we understand now, you did that deliberately, with a clear intention to DECEIVE your client.

Ultimately, you've got into your own traps!
 

So, without completing a really fair settlement ASAP, your relationship with Mr Beloy may not be ended. And as you were refusing to speak about specific digits for the settlement, he may continue insisting on his own price.
It seems up to your phenomenal incompetence, arrogance, and greed prevents you from realizing your fatal mistake:
YOU HAVE SET UP YOUR OWNERS!

Unless this case is arranged IMMEDIATELY, you will be responsible for consequences.

We are sending this letter to ONE EMAIL ONLY!
Mr Beloy expects your answer within three days, - by the morning of November 25, 2016. In particular, info about a tracking number of urgent express mail by which you (1) deliver to him his new Visa card; and (2) promise for the settlement with your price. After that we will consider ourselves free to take our next steps.
 

YOUR jobs, assets of your shareholders, and your Future is going to be on the stack!
"Whilst we acknowledge this is not the outcome you have hoped for, we trust that we have relayed our position clearly."


Sincerely,

D****** **********
on behalf of S. Beloy
 

**************************************************************

The Barclays Bank has NEVER RESPONDED TO THE LETTER ABOVE!

See what my supporters added about it on December 11, 2018:

"... Barclays' CEOs for years DECEIVE its staff, shareholders, partners, and even members of their families about Beloy's case. And we were SHOCKED with details.

Starting with, they argue existence of ANY(!) DEBT to its customer Sergiy Beloy! (In this connection we would recall that in 2015 it took almost 5 months for their customer service just to accept in written at least existence of official Beloy's savings accounts in the Barclays bank). Further CEOs' presentation of these events is based on their intentionally FALSE statement that in 2016 they have paid their debt to Mr Beloy already. We must refute that LIE:
 

First, that wasn't about reimbursing their debt to Sergiy! It was about their first (and as appeared later, the only)  tiny symbolic payment towards their future Settlement. And it took for them the whole 16 YEARS. And Sergiy did NOT obtain that money at all!!!
Because the CEOs did it IMPOSSIBLE for him!
They sent to Sergiy their banking CHEQUE (Bankers Draft), which Sergiy could not cash!

Banks in his country stopped processing any checks a year before! And to cash it in Europe or anywhere in the world requires opening a local banking account, which is impossible for non-residents! And the Barclays CEOs KNEW that: Sergiy told that them for a half of year before, and a half of year after that sending! However, among all other legally existing ways of sending money proposed them by Sergiy (transfer to his bank in his native country, or through any other international money transfer services, e.g., "Western Union"), they intentionally (FRAUDULENTLY) chosen the only one that was  IMPOSSIBLE for Sergiy!
 

But much bigger degree of that FRAUD appeared in their using the fact of receiving that cheque by Beloy as evidence of their official paying all Barclays' debts to him. And we have all reasons to believe that was a main and the only purpose of that transaction!

Since then, the Barclays' CEOs makes a FALSE impression that they (1) paid their debt, and (2) paid it in full. Neither of these statements is true.
............."

SEE MORE AT

"Rule Of Law 2019"

- to be continued -