Email to ALL banks of May 17

RE: Re. End of Banks Day!
==========================================

We are proposing to ALL British banks to find a way for stopping attempts of K*ILL*NG the biggest creditor of the Barclays PLC and Bank Of England by their CEOs instead of returning their debt to him, - together with K*ILL*NG banking industry, capitalism, and money in general! We are offering unprecedented THOUSAND PERCENTs reward for any your investment into help to that person, whose name is S. Beloy, from a collateral of that debt, which currently may be evaluated in TRILLIONS GBP, after the debt is repaid in full.
--- see more below ---

International team for supporting Beloy's 
BMoney (Barclays/BOE's debt to Beloy) 
in Baltic countries, EU

P.S.
Our Bill to the Barclays and BOE for our efforts of sending this message out on May 17 only is 1,000.00 US$ . This amount needs to be added to the sum of the overall Barclays' debt to Mr Beloy.

=================================
*** Our Previous Letters:

The record number of responses and questions about our yesterday'smessages titled "End of Banks Day" urged us to publish FULL text of that appeal to ALL banks of May 9:


"The second biggest bank of the UK Barclays PLC de-facto announced the end of banks! The failure of the Barclays' CEOs to pay a debt to its customer during unprecedented 18 years is to be transformed to a global collapse of the whole banking system, starting from the Bank of England (failed in this case source of the "last reserve" for all British banks) and up to Your business as well.
The CEOs of the banks in the Middle East and Europe under the brand of the Barclays are attempting to shift their responsibility for returning the debt to its parent bank in London, UK, where twenty years ago the customer S. Beloy (100% legitimately) opened his savings account to place the money the Government of the UK granted him for his victory in the open international contest , and where later it appeared impossible for him to get a visa to (despite he never broke any law). But for the last 18 years this story has outgrown the scale of initially banal example of yet another case of bad quality of services of the Barclays:
As paying debts on time is a foundation of not just banking practice, but also of all modern money, which is often called "debt money", today this fact of intentional breaking the fundamentals of the financial industry by the system bank with more than 325 years' history may be understood as an action of the Barclays' CEOs for CANCELLING MONEY!!!
Are you agree to participate in the Barclays' k*lling of the basic principles required for existence of money? The price of the question is the following:
You are either silently allow the Barclays to continue its current K*LLING (literally, by all possible ways) the customer who actually provided it with a de-facto loan counted in TRILLIONS US$ their lawyers allege the bank is under no obligation to return, - TOGETHER with the overall banking industry, including YOUR bank!, - OR take action for affecting the destiny of CEOs of the bankrupted Barclays PLC until a settlement with S. Beloy is implemented. 
Some representatives of the foreign branches of the Barclays, for meeting with whom Beloy had to travel around the world for his own expense, simply adviced him to apply to the court for returning his money. That advice is yet another consequence of the Barclays' vicious practice of dividing its important problems to absolutely separate bits of small, formally unrelated, and thus completely harmless for its CEOs events, for which it's impossible to find anobody in the Barclays responsible for.     
Beloy's reply for the advice, however, is "WHY?"!!! Why a banking customer has to GO TO THE COURT FOR GETTING BACK HIS OWN MONEY? Why he needs to additionally spend his own time (YEARS of his own life, to be precise), efforts (at the level of executing a full time qualified job, but with a zero salary), and more money (which CEOs of the Barclays know for sure he doesn't have)?!! Why he is forced by the Barclays CEOs to go through all related stresses and actually DIRECT ATTEMPTING OF HIS BANK TO K*LL HIM?!!
The Barclays' separated in all senses staff is happy to keep their naive illusions the scale of their responsibility is limited by the sum of initial deposit of the customer at the end of last century, which was small. But the Barclays' CEOs did their best for not informing them for Beloy's Counter of Debt of Barclays to him with a $Million, - and later $Billion!!!, - Per Day percentage, which the CEOs have not stopped since 2012. That was manifestation of yet another sign of their arrogance towards ordinary Barclays' customers supported by their own lawyers they hired for generating formal excuses for facts of Barclays' crimes. In this particular case, however, result of that practice of simply not doing anything for correcting the problems the Barclays' CEOs created, appeared turned into its opposite, - just because of "helpful" advices of expensive Barclays' lawyers:
In 2012 Mr Beloy did all possible for informing the Barclays in advance about starting the Counter unless his savings are returned within a month (and that was after his previous waiting for the return for the long twelve years), - including sending an officially signed letter with notary certified copies of his passport to the Barclays' President by registered post, receipt for which was later widely published in the Internet community, with including references to corresponding web links in all his emails to the Barclays during next several years. And according to legal (and banking) practice, silence means agreement. Thus Beloy's Counter of the Barclays Debt, - that is currently counted in TRILLIONS US$!!!, - is fully legitimate!

In addition, the Barclays continued ignoring necessity for returning its debt to S. Beloy, including his original deposit at Barclays' accounts. Despite the later sum was not big, especially comparing to average salaries in rich countries, including the Barclays' staff, it would be sufficient for a year's survival in his native country. Anyway, even original amount of his savings account in the Barclays would be more than enough for not going into debts in which he (first in his life) appeared during recent years, - exclusively because of dealing with the Barclays bank!
Meanwhile, degree of arrogance of the Barclays' CEOs about destiny of their customer(s) beat its own record by officially(!) declaring they will not respond to S. Beloy on the matter anymore, - absolutely unbelievable for any bank practice, especially considering existence of its debt to that customer. Despite his constant appeals to the bank since 2015 with a demand to allow access to his own money ASAP.
In result, last year S. Beloy was forced to sell for a fraction of its real cost the most valuable property he had, - the one and only apartment where he lived over thirty years, - just to avoid confiscating it by the state for the debts caused by the Barclays. And although Barclays CEOs seems appeared satisfied with what they did with the person who used to trusted all his life savings by opening account in their bank last century, their high paid lawyers have set them up again. And that time it appeared more than serious:

According to the famous Admiralty (Sea) Law, the above-mentioned transaction means the whole Barclays has became a property of S. Beloy!!! Once and forever!!! Period!
De-facto, he bought the Barclays' CEOs. Because he actually paid the Barclays' debt. And unlike most banks, he paid it with his own money. Namely, in quite real US$ cash. Obtained with the price of constant stresses and survival at the dangerous edge, with real risks for his life. In other words, he has earned the right for changing his status and speaking with the current financial elite directly. And by refusing to return their debt, as well as silently allowing its biggest creditor to pay it instead of them, CEOs of both the Barclays PLC and Banks Of England have actually sold their banks to S. Beloy! Together with all its assets and interests of all their shareholders and owners.
Any attempts of doubting that fact will mean refusing main principles of Capitalism, the Admiralty Law (aka "Sea Law", de-facto Law Of Money), together with fundamentals of financial and banking industry based on a need to pay debts.
Any attempts of speculating on the lack of a 100% documented evidence for existence of the  Barclays' debt to S. Beloy is rather recklessly. It's not his problem. Just on the contrary, - that's exclusively your problem! Beginning from a fault of the Barclays' lawyers, who evidently abused the law by creating a text of agreement, which simply excludes their obligation to return the money people deposited to the Barclays!!!

Even full absence of formal papers about any debt does not automatically cancel it. In our case, thousands people around the world know about existence of the Barclays' debt. What is more important, there are all reasons to state each and all Barclays' CEOs are fully aware about this story as well  (no matter how high is their completely artificial wall built by a specially hired staff for separating themselves from the the rest of the world, starting from the Barclays' customers). The CEOs, however, keep playing their childish game with kicking their personal responsibility far away.
And considering a complete absense of clear descriptions of the procedures required for situations like Beloy's story, the Barclays does not have his written consent (and any right) for enforcing him to resolve this conflict the way they unilaterally (that is, illegitimately) insist on during last 18 years, and up to the present.
That may appear a serious problem for all banks, - the biggest ever legal b*mb, capable to dest*roy the world financial system. And that in addition of widespread misusing by the banks the word "banking deposit" that in reality means a LOAN for the bank (obviously, with missing a higher percentage typical for loans, as well as with a less strict guatantees about returning that loan to the customers, in our case in particular). 
Anyway, the actual loan taken from the banking customer without his consent (let alone without discussing with him a percentage rate for that service to the bank), as well as without any obligation of the bank to return that loan at a clearly specified date, while practically impossible for the customer to obtain it on his own, under any jurisdiction MEANS STEALING!!!
Add to it that that unprecedented equivalent of creating for themselves an eternal loan without any formal requirement for its repayment has been fully endorsed by the Barclays CEOs! Together with approval of their professional lawyers. And despite all objections of the customer.
Among other things, this stealing is especially dangerous if it has a SYSTEM nature and scale, used widely by other banks. And that has to be added to yet another Barclays' crime of its periodic forcing the customer to break the law of his country during almost twenty years.

Anyway, this particualr case appeared unprecedented in many senses. Why the CEOs think Mr Beloy will apply to the court only for resolving the smallest problem the Barclays created for him? There are a lot of ways of killing, and Barclays CEOs'in this case has tried them almost all (moreover, their attempting of k*lling its biggest ever creditor continues right now).
Today, May 9, on the Victory Day for the WW2, as well as birthday for father of S. Beloy (who passed away three years ago, - partly because of lack of a proper medical treatment, caused by financial difficulties from the side of the Barclays) it's appropriate to announce that along with creating a precedent for demanding official procedure for bankruptcy of the Barclays PLC and Bank Of England (if required), main charge in the future court will be about their intentional attempts of k*lling their biggest investor, fundamentals of the banking industry, and money in general!!!
In other words, we will need to demand SHUTTING DOWN ALL BANKS around the world, -including YOURS! - unless a really fair settlement with S. Beloy is implemented in full. 

From now on, you are the next players in this strory.
Because of the Barclays, you are already in the game!"

Barclays' REFERENCE # A3579694

International team for supporting Beloy's
BMoney (Barclays/BOE's debt to Beloy)
from Narva City, Estonia, EU
on May 09, 2018

=====================================
Date: May 15, 2018
To: Mark Carney and all CEOs of
the Bank Of England, UK

This is 24 hrs advance notice about our intention to start discussing all details of the coming end of the Bank Of England (resulted from the fact of its failure to pay debts of de-facto bankrupted Barclays PLC and and distantiating of the BOE's CEOs from that problem during at least last 24 months) with all British banks.

We are not in a position to fire Barclays' CEOs. You are!
And unless the Bank Of England start taking decisive steps for protecting key fundamentals of banking industry, the Barclays currently is des*troying, including interests of shareholders of all British banks, we will obtain legal reasons for demanding your retirement! Sorry.

In this particular case we are on the side of banks. You are not!
Because we are protecting a need for returning debts. The fact of refusal of the Barclays PLC during unprecedented 18 years (without setting for itself any limitation against approaching that number to infinity) to make any move (even when it would cost them a zero during first 12 years) for implementing a general banking model, in which money for banking loans are supported by deposits from the public, - which banks are required to return!, - is a precedent of actual announcement by one of the most influential British bank, with its 326+ years history that is older than the Bank Of England (a model for all existing Central Banks in the world) that all debts to all banks, in particular, customer's loans and mortgages, are not necessary to be repaid anymore!

An attempt of the Barclays on fifteen's year of this story to simulate its activity formally, namely, sending to S. Beloy a check that is impossible to use in his country (despite all his warnings about that to the Barclays during previous 10 months), appeared yet another example of embarrassing attitude of the Barclays' CEOs towards banking investors, - which their lawyers besides immediately used against the customer without his consent for illegal termination of their responsibility once and forever. That check, however, has never been cashed. Meaning the fact S. Beloy has not received from the Barclays bank a penny since end of last century! Moreover, the above-mentioned false attempt of the Barclays appeared a fact of decisive importance for forcing S. Beloy to sell his only place of living for paying the debts that would never exist with access to his money at Barclays' account.

Among other things, by doing that, the Barclays' CEOs with their lawyers, who used to be a decisive factor for stopping that access because of their (ill-founded) doubts in validity of  Beloy's home address, ultimately HAVE DES*TROYED for their customer existence of one of the most important his factors, required practically for any legal activity in any country, including dealing with any bank, - the permanent place of living!

That's why, finally appearing in Dubai, UAE, - the first country with the Barclays' branches the customer was able to visit since 2000 in result of immigration and financial restrictions, - he demanded from the local Barclays' CEOs to restore the above-mentioned legal element required for his rights their parent company des*troyed. In particularly, he proposed them to buy for him an apartment in the center of Dubai for account of the Barclays PLC. The source of funds for that was a subject of internal talks among all related Barclays' CEOs. A similar proposal S. Beloy presented to Barclays' staff personally in other cities with Barclays offices, including Paris, France.
However, despite all numerous promises he heard, up to now, many months later, the Barclays PLC has not restored that critically important for all legal rights element, required among other things just for a decent human existence, of its customer the bank k*lled.

We would be glad to use traditional ways of dealing with staff of the banks, including applying to the court we are sure this customer will win. But both you and the Barclays have crossed certain red lines far ago, making main issue of this conflict be possible to resolve only on a system level. And from the system level, the Barclays bank looks like a strongly fortified fortress, supported by highly paid professional lawyers for protection of its CEOs against attacks of its rightfully angry customers. We are not going to attack the adamant walls of that fortress built specifically for those customers. Our case is an exception, after all. In all senses, including this.
We are not going to run void and endless legal battles, for which the Barclays seems is prepared better than for a peaceful resolution (let alone prevention) of similar conflicts. Why you think the client who trusted his money to the Barclays is required to obtain it exclusively through the court?
We are inventing a legal way for starting the war against the Barclays by hands of current Barclays' friends, - its investors and shareholders. We are proposing to them both to (a) defend their financial future from the Barclays' risky manipulations on a system level with canceling banks and money in general, and (b) earn up to UNPRECEDENTED THOUSAND PERCENT of Beloy's reward for their investment for a real assistance to him in this conflict he promises to pay after returning to him its debts in full. 
Their cumulative attacks may appear fatal for the bank's CEOs.  For their real owners, for example, the walls of the Barclays fortress do not exist by definition. There can be strikes from all possible directions, a war of the whole system, the bank is a part of, - instead of a direct battle with one customer only. And from one country only. And the same approach is applicable to The Bank Of England.

We are not going to stick into details of all that exhausting complexity, prepared by Barclays' lawyers for similar cases exclusively for masking two main facts:
(1) The customer legitimately deposited his money to the bank,
(2) The bank has not returned it to him during 18 years,
... and has no intention to return it ever.
The price for resulting fact of this fully documented stealing must be significantly higher than any sum of initial deposit and slightly increased percentage. While the current Barclays' remuneration is only $0,00.
We are also protecting Capitalism, including its principle for a corresponding payment for any job. In particular, the BILL for our preparation work during last several months for the discussion campaign for supporting S. Beloy is 30,000 US$, - which we are proposing to you to implement IMMEDIATELY with 3 transfers for 10,000 each to the name of S. Beloy through any financial service for money transfers in Tallinn, Estonia, - as a proof we are not doing this as a part of our own game for our own gain; besides, S Beloy currently needs money more than we.

By not making any move within next 24 hours towards starting repaying either the debt in full, or a really fair settlement, the Bank Of England will justify and endorse any our actions and future campaigns, including public appeals to banks, as well as all actions of S. Beloy, he and we decide to use for resolving this case.


International team for supporting Beloy's 
BMoney (Barclays/BOE's debt to Beloy) 
in Baltic countries, EU

===========================================
Date: May 05, 2018

This is to inform you about beginning of the Baltic phase of the international campaign for returning debts of the Barclays to S. Beloy.
After failure of the Barclays' branches in Paris and Dubai to arrange necessary steps towards final settlement with Beloy, the only conclusion could be made: To prevent further (void) simulation of activity for this case from the Barclays' staff, updated bill to the Barclays' CEOs for compensation of expenses of Beloy is generated. The bill includes compensation for full expenses of S. Beloy he had paid in 2018 for his travel to Dubai, United Arabic Emirates, where he had to spent almost a month waiting for response from local Barclays' branches, with paying astronomic prices for hotel accommodation comparing with his own country. Considering arrogant refusal of the Barclays' CEOs in London, UK to pay its debts that began as stealing a 100% legitimate deposit of the customer in their bank, as well as their reluctance to deal with the problem of issuing the UK visa (resulted mostly because of not possessing a certain minimal financial status des*troyed by the Barclays), the only solution is to make extensive visits to all branches of the Barclays and its business partners around the world to convince them any debt must always be paid.
In particular, in addition to the countries mentioned above, Mr Beloy visited related businesses of the Barclays in Doha, Qatar, and in other countries of the Middle East and European Union, including his visit to Paris, France in April. All details for the process are to be published, discussed, and regularly updated in the Internet community until a final Settlement of the Barclays with Beloy will be implemented.

As of today, April 5, the new bill to the Barclays for spending his money, time, and efforts for the activity during recent months only is yet another $10,000 (TEN THOUSAND US DOLLARS) added to the sum of the overall Barclays' debt to him. This is a minimal amount for suspension of his activity for a while.
This is a formal notice for the Barclays' CEOs for the bill.
The money should be sent through any express money payment service to the name of S. Beloy in Tallinn, Estonia, EU (your confirmation of the sending through email is a must). And like all previous bills, it is due
IMMEDIATELY!!!


International team for supporting Beloy's 
BMoney (Barclays/BOE's debt to Beloy) 
in Baltic countries, EU

===========================================