"Let's recall some chronology for my global BMoney:
On January 9, 1988 the famous article about "Phoenix" Money in the Rothschild's Economist magazine predicted creation of a completely new currency by the year 2018. Exactly 30 years later (on January 9, 2018) me, a customer of so called "system" bank Barclays, one of the biggest British banks with three hundred years' history (older than its underlied Central Bank of the U.K. BOE), to whom since 2000 it prevented access for his money, obtained from British Government (that since forties controls the BOE) due to his winning their open international contest, mentioned a strange similarity between essence of the predicted "Phoenix" and my own BMoney (Barclays/BOE's debt to Beloy) the Barclays brutally provoked me to create - by jeopardising my life (see my previous videos for details)!
Other elements of this mosaic include such events as appearence from practically nowhere a ready-to-use Bitcoin technology back in 2009, on the wave of severe financial crisis through some mistirious Japanese person who seems never existed in reality. Two years ago the BOE's Barclays became the first British bank that accepted Bitcoin transactions (well, mostly for making donations, but I tend to use most of my BMoney for donations as well).
But was Bitcoin a direct prototype for the Rothschild's "Phoenix" Money? Hardly. Rather, it tests some parts of various versions of the future monetary system, and/or masking a real design of the "Phoenix".
Beginning with, cryptocurrencies are not as secure as they are advertized. In fact, there exist no 100% secure mathematical algorithm created by people, which other people would be unable to crack. It is simply impossible! Today it's mostly a matter of available computing power. In addition to other tricks for practically direct accessing any ciphered content.
Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase, who previously served on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, has referred to Bitcoin as a “Fraud”. So did most economists. Indeed, the truth is Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies in general are not real, and not backed by anything. Although most people don’t realize, our current fiat currencies we use every day are in the same position: They were created artificially, backed by nothing, but under close control of private companies, including BIS.
The problem of the BIS, however, is CEOs of its BOE's Barclays bank openly DESTROY PRIVATE property, and consequently, Capitalism in general! In particular, they avoid paying not just direct debts to me caused by the undeniable fact of their refusing to perform their direct working duties for unprecedented period of 18 years, but also reimbursing efforts of their customer, equivalent to a full time qualified job, for contacting and embarassingly stressful dealing with the Barclays staff during all that time.
So what can be in reality under the name Phoenix?
Jeff Thomas in his "The End of the Debt-As-Currency Era" article recalled Aristotle's definition of money: "For something to be appropriate as money, it must have intrinsic value". Well, face it, no national currency today is redeemable in anything that has intrinsic value. It exists as a promise only! Promise from government in written to pay its debt. Then Jeff adds:
Doug Casey has rightly called the dollar (since going off the gold standard) an “I owe you nothing.” Exactly correct. He also describes the Euro as a “Who owes you nothing?” since no one country in the EU is responsible to redeem the euro with anything that possesses intrinsic value. ..." Correspondingly, "Cryptos can accurately be described as “You have no idea who owes you nothing.” Their inherent value is exactly zero.
In this dimension, the BMoney is my personal promise to pay off my future debts, if any, after Barclays/BOE/BIS repays their debts to me in full. Thus the BMoney, unlike any current currency, including all its future versions known to me up to the date, is based on (a) ETERNAL human values, in particular, my spotless honesty supported by the fact of not breaking the law during all my life, which appeared a key reason for the Barclays CEOs to refuse returning to me my money during last 18 years (with their related attempts to turn me into criminal by one or another way), and ultimately, forced me to invent BMoney; and (b) trust to oral WORD, without written formality, which places BMoney beyond any legal space that otherwise might be abused for stopping its existence. Eternal values in the core of BMoney allow quilifying it as the only supranational money really possible. Predictions of the Rothschilds becomes a reality?
BMoney were started in accordance with the Barclays/BOE/BIS rules, including so called Admiralty Law, The Sea Law Of Money (see my video serials titled "Legality of BMoney").
In this connection it is worth to mention that legally both BIS and BOE are located outside any country, with their own legislation. In particular, very first amendments made in the Charter of the BIS almost immediately after its launching stated the bank did not depend on any external factors, while the underlying capital is sacredly inviolable and cannot be confiscated under any possible scenario. Excepting ... the current case of destroying the system from inside, namely, by key BIS' members, - the BOE with its Barclays bank! Will the owners of the BIS be smart enough to join my appeal for stopping the k*lling (see my previous letters) and preventing destruction of its own future?
It's quite understandable if such supranational organization as the BIS can always have the upper hand in resolving any conflict due to using their own rules it writes for itself.
All arguments of the Barclays CEOs that existence of their debt should be 100% confirmed through the court only are miserable. What they expect to hear from the judge? That the debt, about which they, - as well as thousands people around the world!, - are fully aware of, does not exist? Since when? Debt of the Barclays/BOE behind BMoney is my valid promissory collateral.
Why I need to go through the court to prove the evident facts of the Barclays' (1) taking my money as banking deposit, (2) not returning it to me during 18 years?
My questions and answers are simple:
(1) Did the Barclays take my money? Yes, it did.
(2) Did the Barclays fail to return it to me during last 18 years? Yes, it did.
As simple as that!
The Barclays lawyers did their best to complicate these simple answers to infinity. But that's their problems, not mine. Why should I apply to the court? To find what? That I did not deposited my money to the Barclays? But I did. That they did not delayed returning my money for 18 years? But they did. I know the answers. And they know these answers as well. So why we need to play that childish game? To further complicate the essense of the whole story to degree only the court will be able to "un-complicate" it?
To fool themselves and simply freeze the whole case at the current point? But that is not possible anymore. BMoney have arrived and will be in circulation untill the debt is finally paid.
If the Barclays CEOs wanted to object the deal, they could say it officially. But in this case they would be required to switch to more uncomfortable questions about not returning Beloy's deposit. So they simply kept silence. And silence in the court legally means consent with what was said. The Barclays simply chosen not to use their rights for objection! Their CEOs simply did nothing, despite knowing their non-action jeoperdizes customer's life, thus voluntary waiving their rights and allowing Beloy's rules to come into force. Why they would raise this issue today then?
But even more important question is:
Who on earth would agree to take responsibility for saying the Barclays/BOE/BIS are in INFINITE debt? Just show me that brave person!
Why should I ever have a desire to have additional stresses of the court? To find what?
Even if the court decides the debt magically disappeared, will it dissappear in reality?
The most amazing secret about any money is that it's not important whether there are real values behind it, including any kind of someones' debt, or not. From some point it is simply not important!!! In fact, the only real thing behind any money is people's FAITH the money is real, isn't it?
Meanwhile, all Central Banks nowdays are in the process of unprecedented increasing of their assets, which means buying debts of governments (in the form of QE) and mortgage securities that often are an evident "garbage". According to the Bank of America, from 2011 to 2016 just first five biggest Central Banks of the world, including BOE and SNB, increased its assets for 7 trillions, - with denying key laws of market economy, which require from businesses to have some profit. Main trend, however, is the "Lender-Of-Last-Resort" aggressively moves to becoming the "Bankrupt-Of-Last-Resort".
And although it seems the main aim of BIS' owners is in expanding its purchase for debts of all private businesses (e.g., through European Corporate Sector Purchase Programme, CSPP) , which in fact always means corresponding transferring of ownership, - just like result of my purchasing the Barclays' debts in August 2017! Only few people understand consequences of working Central Banks at a loss (in particular, with negative rates) ...
Now, what about buying their own debts the BOE's Barclays forces me to demand from the BIS today?
As far as I understand, for Central Banks buying their own debts is a clear sign for beginning of so called "end of everything", - the final crash of the world's financial system! By keeping silence since 2012 for avoiding any decent Settlement about this case, the Barclays/BOE/BIS' provokes injection of my BMoney into real economy, which is a kind of practically infinite(!) super QE, capable to dramatically accelerate that fatal process, and finally bury the current monetary system.
If that was Rothschild's plan, well, it can become a reality very soon. However, I am obviosly objecting implementing that at the cost of my life the suicidal CEOs are trying to take before their own ones!!! The Barclays bank with its underlying BOE have crossed the line! Now the BIS, the Central Bank of all Central Banks, should either IMMEDIATELY(!) SETTLE the story, or publically announce about taking full responsibility for otherwise inevitable financial crash that now can happen at any moment!
Even without considering other numerous facts of (at least) unethical behaviour of the Barclays staff in this case as examples of evidently bad banking service, despite all my warnings about danger and direct risk of such attitude for my life, that activity (or maleficent non-activity) may be treated as intentional attempts of actual K*LLING me, whether that is implemented financially, or by any other way.
Since last summer, I have no permanent place of living, which belongs to me. I have no well paid job that I previously had, which simply disappeared due to changing overall demand caused by financial crisis in my country. Since 2015 I desperately asked my bank for access to my own money to just not die of hunger during updating and accommodating my professional skills to the new job situation I needed badly. The Barclays arrogantly refused. Thus I had to focus all my efforts on miserable surviving with low paid jobs (the only available opportunity under these circumstances) INSTEAD of proper re-education to more decent job). In result, I have actually no money. My last life savings I spent mostly for paying debts caused by the Barclays (and instead of Barclays). I have actually no private property, let alone expensive or luxury one, like car, etc. But I have a debt of the Barclays to me! The debt, which (:) during many years suddenly for corresponding CEOs ultimately became gigantic! INFINITE!!!
But it's not my problem anymore.
Now it's YOUR PROBLEM!!!!"
************************************************
The most logical way of resolving this story would be initiationg a proper Settlement agreement with S. Beloy, after which the whole case will be closed once and forever. But for years both Barclays a and BOE's CEOs intentionally avoid any settlement. Why? Moreover, they keep torpedoing all Beloy's proposals, thus heating up and exacerbating initially simple and banal conflict caused by their personal mismanagement and/or bad service of the bank, to the highest degree of absurdity! In result, it's more than just deadly stucking with their delusions.
Beloy's case is either really exceptional, or first sign of beginning for some general trend the bankers prefer not to discuss in the public. In the light of the above-mentioned recent activity of central banks, one may speak about their GENOCIDE of banking customer(s) to whom they own money. Look to the Wikipedia's definition: "Genocide is intentional action to destroy a people ... in whole or in part".
Correspondingly, either the sum (and urgency for implementing) of the Settlement should be really exceptional, or the BIS should make official public announcement about changing its policy.
The time is ticking fast.
You don't have it at all!
International Team for supporting
Beloy's BMoney (BIS/BOE/Barclays'
debt to Beloy)
No comments:
Post a Comment