Top British CRIMINAL BOARD?

As during last 3 days British Home Secretary (Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Home Department), The Right Honourable Sajid Javid, MP, AND British Finance Minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr Philip Hammond, have not reacted to my Open Letter "Anti-Criminal?" sent to them to their personal and official emails, twitter, and other addresses, including ones of their related collegues at work, Parliament, Press, and published at several websites at worldwide Internet),

 I INSIST ON IMMEDIATE SHUTTING DOWN their new British Economic Crime Strategic Board with corresponding RESIGNING ALL Co-Chairs of the Board!!! 

Being forced by current Barclays' CEOs to start re-investigation of Bob Diamond's LIBOR case, just to save  my own LIFE, I and my supporters came to the SHOCKING CONCLUSION:

THE TOP WORLD'S REGULATORS, INCLUDING BRITISH FCA, USED CERTAIN HIDDEN SYSTEM FEATURES OF MODERN MONEY TO TURN FACTS OF REGULAR LIBOR FRAUDS TO BUILDING THEIR OWN MEGA BUBBLE - ARTIFICIALLY CREATED DEMAND NICHE FOR EARNING PRACTICALLY UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF $MILLIONS AS FINES TO BANKS!

AS FOR NOW, SEE MORE RELATED DETAILS AT:
https://bmoney2017.blogspot.com/2019/02/bobs-libor-2019.html
https://bmoney2017.blogspot.com/2019/01/abnormal-barclays-intelligence.html
https://bmoney2017.blogspot.com/2019/02/infinity.html


My first suspicions were caused by official digits for amounts of imposed fines! They could not be so perfectly round:
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) obtained from Barclays bank US$200 million in fines. The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) - US$160 million. The British Financial Services Authority (FSA) fined Barclays Bank for £59.5 million, but that was with 30% discount (like in any shopping business :-). Without the discount FSA's fine would have been £85.00 million.

Who said that exactly such and such sum of fine is appropriate? Where these digits came from?
Although these prices tags might look fine in any food store, main problem with the LIBOR case is it has been dealing with INFINITY! In fact, ANY amount of money  taken from infinite Bubble would be sufficient (and that is extremely attractive for Bubbles' creators). Substraction from Infinity any amount will not decrease Infinity. The result of any mathematical operation will be the same Infinity!!!
In other words, ANY AMOUNT OF FINES, would be OK! Quite sufficient reason to keep details of the whole thing SECRET. Or at least HIDE them from the public with artificial COMPLEXITY!

So, the U.K. bank Barclays only paid $453 million to U.S. and British authorities to settle allegations that it  manipulated Libor.

Not a bad "business" for them too!

But..

Hey!

That was a significant burden 

for innocent Barclays' 

SHAREHOLDERS, 

rather than for Barclays bank!!!

Its CEO Bob Diamond left the bank with his regular 17 millions in bonuses he usually accurued for himself every year. And that the key feature of all Bubbles: The money is taken away from innocent and usually much poorer public that is not in the "business".