This post dethrones the key Barclays' MYTHS about my case its CEOs would be glad to call the TRUTH. Distributing wittingly FALSIFIED information has always been called a LIE. A purposeful insisting of the Barclays bank that its wittingly falsified information is true, is crime of FRAUD!
#1. The first biggest FRAUD of Barclays CEOs is denying their STEALING money from my savings accounts! Formally, their lawyers may call their stealing by any substitution of that word, but that only stresses their obvious attempts of formal hiding the fact of Barclays' ROBBERY behind complexity of legal regulation they are a part of. However, the ESSENCE of the action the Barclays bank did in my case was taking away all my money without my consent, and without any obligation to return it in a clearly specified point of time in the Future (that is, even formally, practrically FOREVER), - and that is STEALING by any definition!
Existence of that fact of stealing does not depend on its actual sum, and/or on how my money was used after that (in any case top Barclays' beneficiaries profited from that stealing due to FACT OF EVIDENT FALCIFYING REAL Barclays' FINANCIAL BALANCE SHEET, AS WELL AS COUNT OF THEIR PERSONAL MERITS for success of the Barclays' business, THEIR BONUSES DIRECTLY DEPEND ON WHICH, especially concerning the FATAL RISING OF DERIVATIVE Barclays' debts to me in the time, - practically UP TO INFINITY COUNTED IN $QUADRILLIONS, WHICH NULLIFIES ALL Barclays' assets and makes it formally BANKRUPT!
Compare the latter with the 1 Billion of profit per second quartal the Barclays CEOs announced recently. Obviously, without mentioned my story in the public, - EVER!
#2. The second biggest FRAUD of Barclays CEOs is denying their evident attempts of KILLING ME!
Just like in Fraud #1, formally, their lawyers may call that PERMANENT process of ENDANGERING MY LIFE, WHICH LASTS FOR YEARS due to previous FRAUDULENT ACTIONS of Barclays' staff by any substitution of these words, allowing them to hide that crime behind complexity of legal regulation they are a part of. However, the ESSENCE of the action the Barclays bank does in my case is a FACT of existing their open attempts to KILL ME in the form of my DYING due to "natural reasons" formally not related to them directly:
OUT OF HUNGER, COLD
at the streets of foreign countries,
at the streets of foreign countries,
RELATED HEALTH PROBLEMS
AND SHOCKING DESPAIR OF
HOMELESS, JOBLESS, & MONEYLESS
EXISTENSE WITH ABSOLUTELY
NO FUTURE!!!
Banks are not people (since XV century, when banks introduced the "smart" concept of "Juridical Person" for avoiding MORAL RESPONSIBILTY for its actions). There are many forms of KILLING (physical, psychological, financial, etc.), each of which can CAUSE A DEATH! Bankers use FINANCIAL KILLING! Their weapon is AMOUNT OF MONEY! In a global scale, insufficient amount of money in any national economy causes financial CRISES. On individual level, - personal poverty. In fact, the latter is a HIDDEN WAY OF DYING SLOWLY!
With a lack of any social and medical support Europeans take for granted, incuding right for a legal job and ANY SOURCE OF INCOME, COMPLETE ABSENCE OF MONEY in my case MEANS DEATH! And that kind of KILLING Barclays' CEOs permanently(!) attempt to implement against me during MANY YEARS!!!
In fact, because of the Barclays
I DIED MANY TIMES!!!
ANY PERSON AT MY PLACE
WOULD BE DEAD ALREADY!
And yet another proof of their killing is that they obviously
WILL NOT PAY IT BY TOMORROW!
BECAUSE SIMPLY DON'T WANT TO!
IF THEY WANTED TO PAY THEIR DEBT,
THEY WOULD PAID IT ALREADY!
BUT THEY INTENTIONALLY
DIDN'T!
ATTEMPTS OF FIRST
DEGREE MURDER!
BUT THEY INTENTIONALLY
DIDN'T!
(see below)
AND THAT MEANS THEIRATTEMPTS OF FIRST
DEGREE MURDER!
Well, let me remind you the FACTS:
Barclays' CEOs could and should return me my money on my first requests as early as in the year 2000. Instead, their official response at that time mentioned a really tiny "sub-problem" of their internal task of identifying me. In particular, in addition to a standard pack of documents required in similar cases, they demanded from me a written guarantee(?) from my local BANK that "me is really me". However, the task of 100% satisfying their rules appeared ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE for me! For many reasons, - legitimate, moral, physical, and religious!
Starting with, that required from me BREAKING THE LAW OF MY COUNTRY: The particular kind of requested activity was not in the list of allowed banking businesses strictly regulated by our national Central Bank, - up to cancelling corresponding banking license! So the only way I could satisfy Baclays' demand was through committing a SIN! Namely, by committing a CRIME of BRIBERY, - at least! While God HATES BRIBERY (Matthew 21:12, 13)!
So, I informed the Barclays' staff about it in written, asking about a tiny exception from their rules, - they should not expect from me providing a written guarantee from my local bank that "me is really me". Just because I NEVER IN MY 50+ LIFE BROKE ANY LAW! And it's not my fault that that appeared a main reason for Barclays staff for cutting access for my money actually FOREVER (I have had no intention to become a criminal and sinner, while my arguments to Barclays' employees that their rules were IMPOSSIBLE to use, caused no effect during following FIFTEEN YEARS).
But now go back to the main question of REAL INTENTIONS of Barclays' CEOs:
(a) Was that requested exception critically important for my identification? NO!!!
It was just a small addition (1 of 3) to a main banking practice of identification customers, - copy of passport, and/or, a proof of address. Taking into account the fact of my successful sending to the Barclays bank the remaining "two of three" requested proofs (a copy of my valid passport certified by the state Notary; and official bills sent to my home address) I submitted to Barclays bank on its request several times already, there was a very little sense in what they demanded from me by the price of breaking the Law.
Nevertheless, Barclays' lawyers made it a formal excuse for their staff and CEOs for NOT DOING ANYTHING about the problem they created, and FRAUDULENT not serving me, their customer, during UNPRECEDENTED 15 YEARS!
(b) In 2015, however, that FRAUDULENT formal reason STOPPED TO EXIST, BUT THAT EVENT DID NOT RESULTED IN PAYING TO ME MY MONEY:
At that year I resubmitted to the Barclays bank the most recent pack of copies of my certified passport and state receipts - together with additional documents about validity of my home address (that actually had not changed during previous 30 years):
But it took ANOTHER SEVEN(!) MONTHS for them to finally implement that basic business action:
The problem, however, was: that cheque was
IMPOSSIBLE TO USE!
ABSOLUTELY!!!
There are three basic ways for money transfers: (1) by cheque; (2) by inter-banking transfer to my account in my local bank; (3) by any public service like WesternUnion or MoneyGram.
The problem with cheques was that no bank in my country accepted cheques at that time, - NONE OF THEM! Due to a big amount of processing time and minimal profit for the transactions.
And guess what?
The Barclays CEOs FINALLY
SENT TO ME MY MONEY BY
SENT TO ME MY MONEY BY
THE ONLY WAY
(1 OUT OF 3)
that puts my money into
ABSOLUTELY
INACCESSABLE
DIMENSION:
BY CHEQUE
that puts my money into
ABSOLUTELY
INACCESSABLE
DIMENSION:
BY CHEQUE
(SEE ITS PHOTO ABOVE)
DESPITE I MAY NOT USE CHEQUES
IN ANY(!) COUNTRY OF THE WORLD
IN ANY(!) COUNTRY OF THE WORLD
EXCEPTING United Kingdom,
to which I cannot obtain a visa anyway
to which I cannot obtain a visa anyway
(mostly because of the Barclays bank).
CONCLUSION:
The main INTENTION of the Barclays' CEOs has been to CLOSE THIS SCANDAL CASE FORMALLY, WHILE NOT RETURNING THEIR DEBT TO ME!
AND ONE YEAR LATER THEY COMPLETELY DESTROYED MY ONLY PLACE OF LIVING:
I WAS FORCED TO SELL IT FOR PAYING BARCLAYS' DEBT (INSTEAD OF THE BARCLAYS) WITH FURTHER CREATING Rothschilds Debt #1 they refuse to pay NOW!
THAT IS, MY HOME ADDRESS (TO WHICH THEY COULD SEND RELATED FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS), VALIDITY OF WHICH THEY FRAUDULENTLY DENIED DURING WHOLE 15 YEARS, SIMPLY STOPPED TO EXIST, THUS GIVING THEM ANOTHER FRAUDULENT FORMAL REASON FOR NOT SPEAKING WITH ME ABOUT THEIR DEBTS TO ME!
THUS, THE BARCLAYS' CEOs INTENTIONALLY DID NOT PAY WHEN THEY COULD, THEN INTENTIONALLY CREATED A NEW FORMAL REASON FOR NOT SENDING ANYTHING, - BY MAKING ME HOMELESS!
THE WHOLE THING IS ONE BIG FRAUD!
AND THAT FACT ALLOWS ME
TO DEMAND FROM BARCLAYS CEOs
OR THEIR OWNERS AND SHAREHOLDERS
RESTORING THEIR FRADULENT DISBALANCE
ABOUT MY LIFE STORY IMMEDIATELY:
BEFORE ANY FUTURE SETTLEMENT!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment