Re. End Of Money!
This is not my first appeal to the Federal Reserve, - see my Bill to Fed.
The Bill is still not paid! The Fed's CEOs hidden themselves behind the info-Wall. That's why I am publishing continuation of that topic for the whole world.
***
The main idea behind a concept for creation Central banks is to postpone the event of collapsing the banking system when some critical amount of debts is demanded to be paid off. Joining ALL banks of the world into one big system significantly decreases probability of their default. One thing is when all customers of a certain bank simultaneously start demanding their deposits. And another thing is when all customers of all banks of the city/country/world start doing that. Probablility of these events is different. But no more that that. Even the biggest central banking system of the world cannot guarantee 100% avoiding the bankruptcy in such cases (beginning with, just because the banks never have the 100% of the money they supposed to have).
So, the Central banks system is not about preventing the official bankers' default. Rather, it's about creating the illusion for public that such prevention is possible. Such faith, however, looks good only in the world of digits. In particular, in terms of probability. The problem is, the Barclays CEOs destroyed that illusion.
In result, by avoiding to pay their global debt to me, which is currently counted in $QUADRILLIONS, they have actually overturned the banking and financial system! With the Fed at the top of it. And the bankruptcy of the Fed may actually mean the END OF MONEY!
If none of my debtors is willing to pay their debts to me, the money is cancelled automatically! And speaking about money, it's not about end of a certain currency, be it US dollar or Swiss Frank. Remember, the Barclays CEOs have cancelled the DEBT, on which ANY(!) MONEY IS BASED! No debt - NO MONEY AT ALL!
Are you ready for that?
Is it what you want?
Is it worth your "aptly" avoidance to pay me the first $3,200 I need because of Barclays bank to pay IMMEDIATELY just to
STOP MY FREEZING
WITHOUT WARM DRESSING
RIGHT NOW?
Is it worth your non-payment for a new apartment or house the Barclays CEOs actually destroyed to me four years ago, just because they could (their lawyers didn't mind)?
Is it worth the "salary" for the job of comunicating with the Barclays bank during last twenty one years?
If the answer for the above questions is "yes",
that will mean the
END OF MONEY!
The Barclays CEOs opened Pandora's Box: They have triggered execution of the fatal and hardly reversable chain of events, which overturned the whole system. The system their own prosperity is based on, - in addition to the prosperity of the top financial elites behind them!
Look, along with cancelling the Debt they also cancelled the Law. The first event means End of Banking Usury and Money in general (as money is a debt in its purest form by definition). The second one means end of protection of the wealth for rich people, which actually makes them poor.
And in both cases the Barclays CEOs did it
assymetrically. That is, they cancelled their debt to Barclays' customer(s). In particular, to me, the person who opened account in the Barclays bank 100% legitimately, and never broke the law in his LIFE before that point. Nevertheless, they continued demanding from Barclays' customers paying their debts off. This created precedent of open applying "double" law, in its continuity.
In particularly, Barclays/BOE's CEOs have practiced such double law during at least last 21 years, with further tending to extend that period to infinity. The fact is they showed no intention to stop that double law practicing up to now (tell me how that differs from a banal crime of
stealing). While according to the golden rule of the law, including corresponding
Canon Law of the Vatican, double law means having no law at all!
As my whole case has been a continuous process of constantly increasing degree of intentional(!) abusing the law by the Barclays' lawyers (despite there always existed an alternative opportunity for them to settle the case immediately, practically for the same price), it is difficult to take their twisted appeals to the law seriously.
In contrast, I have all rights to speak and judge about the Barclays' cancellation of the law the way I do now. The story of this case started because of my refusal to break the law, despite the Barclays' lawyers(!) keep attempting to force me the breaking during many years, up to the present time.
In the EU they forced me to do the things absolutely impossible for me to do without breaking the law. In particularly, to stay in (or leave) the foreign countries without the right for any job. That is, ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT MONEY they actually stolen from me, and without ANY LEGITIMATE SOURCE OF INCOME!
The Barclays bank stands at the very beginning of the main chain of cause-and-effect for my case. The case where CEOs of the Barclays bank and corresponding businesses related/associated with it are attempting to KILL me, - together with the system that protects their wealth and future. And the Federal Reserving System is at the other end of that chain.
Now they want from me to forget about the debt they owned to me. In fact, that is a stealing! No matter whether it's formally proved in the court or not. The CEOs know they owe me. They know it perfectly! What's the difference whether there is a 100% formal proof for that or not? They, however, pretend it matters. It's a kind of saying "Well, we know we didn't return your money to you, but ... if there is a 100% proof for our debt, we accept we are in debt. If there is a proof with less than 100% certainty, we are not in the debt! That's what our lawyers told us." Great! But what about the TRUTH? They know it. Yet"childishly" pretend they do not.
Top financial elites, as well as Government of Switzerland, have joined the Barclays CEOs for their attempts to
KILL me. Instead of simply paying their debts!
Instead of contacting the Barclays CEOs,
the Fed silently joined the killings!
That will not eliminate the Barclays' debt!
And if the top financial elites,
including owners of Fed,
think they are smart with
hiding themselves behind
think again:
That has shifted the Barclays'
DEBT TO THEM DIRECTLY
- up to their future generations!
No comments:
Post a Comment