From
Open Letter to ALL LAWYERS:
“Barclays
lawyers are CRASHING the world's legislative system!”
This
post is a continuation of my public discussions about 100%
perfect LEGITIMACY for
my BMoney in general, and Infinite Barclays' Debt to
me in particular, key ideas of which were also mentioned in this blog
previously:
In
contrast, there is another dimension for my story, - the formal point
of view of Barclays lawyers, whose activity ultimately may be
qualified as placing CEOs of the Barclays bank, Bank Of England, the
world's banking industry, and related businesses beyond the
law, - including the legislative system as a whole!
People
who did not read my article "Stupid
Wisdom"
tend to apply for my case standard patterns of wisdom, which are
simply not applicable in my case! In particular, using the widespread
stamp "Any
conflict with banks is to be resolved through
the court only"
is just not possible here! Beginning with, why should it? That
question by itself causes a storm of "noble" anger for
professional lawyers, whose unrealistically high business incomes
become jeopardized because of that.
What
is more alarming, for majority of the public it still is a serious
"split of consciousness" too, but for another reason, -
people simply were taught for centuries that court is the only way
for resolving all major conflicts. And although reality never was
perfect, that mass belief still prevails. My case, however, is really
exceptional, allowing to ask related questions, starting from:
Why
the only way of dealing with banks becomes
a
super expensive and extremely complicated path
through
court only?
The
Barclays' staff in Germany told me that
the
only way to ever approach their CEOs
for
the matter of paying its debts to me
is
through hiring professional lawyer!
Without
my personal lawyer, they did
not
allow me even to enter the main
Barclays'
bank in Frankfurt-on-Main.
REALLY?
Is
it the essence of banking service?
Demand
fulfilling its key functions
THROUGH
COURT ONLY?
Then
say it clearly to the public!
That
should be the first, - and the only! -
clause
in any banking Agreement then!
It
might be certain claims of Barclays CEOs that their decision to not
return me my money was lawful. I guess, their professional lawyers
did their best to persuaded the CEOs in that. My question is why they
have not done their best to inform their CEOs that returning money to
customers is lawful too?
Look,
the Barclays' CEOs had two choices:
To
pay, or Not to pay me my money.
BOTH(!)
choices were LAWFUL*!
Why
they chosen the latter then?
And
why they insist on the
not
paying during last 20 years?
They
could choose any path.
And
first 12 years(!) it could be
FREE
FOR THEM!
And
the same is about their freedom
of
choice about form of that payment
(3
ways, of which they ultimately
chosen the
only impossible one,
namely,
by issuing a cheque that
at
that time appeared unacceptable
by
national banking industry, and
completely
forbidden for me for
caching
it out in any European
country
by the law – see below).
And
then related CEO childishly suggest
the
choice they did can must be resolved
through
the court only!
WHY?
Wasn't
that their own PERSONAL choice?
* -
By the way, these two parts of equation for a right choice are not
equal even mathematically: While the decision for paying me is 100%
lawful indeed, the opposite one is not! Good lawyer(s) can easily
question the Barclays' “strategy” of intentional not returning
money to its customer, severely aggrevated by awareness of its staff
about physical danger for his life. Anyway, the resulting “balance”
is not going to be in favor of Barclays bank!
Add
to it that the Barclays' awareness can be proved documentally by
hundreds/thousands of facts of obtaining my correspondence by
Barclays' staff through social networks, email, telephone, etc., in
addition to our previous correspondence exchanged by registered mail.
The
Barclays CEOs and lawyers have
put
the world's
BANKINGS
INDUSTRY
BEYOND
THE LAW!!!
And
that problem will not disappear by that way.
De-facto
DEATH OF BANKS HAS HAPPENED
ALREADY!
Due
to precedent made by Barclays bank,
today
everybody may refuse to pay
any
debt to any bank,
as
the law is
EQUAL
TO ALL!
What
they expect to hear from the court?
Formal
approval of the right for their
purely
subjective choice
(FRAUDELENT by its nature)
(FRAUDELENT by its nature)
they
selfishly did
EXCLUSIVELY
in
their own favor?
During
first 12 years the CEOs could
settle
the whole story within minutes
(moreover,
they still can)
FOR
FREE!
But
they didn't.
And
not going to.
WHY?
The
only explanation for that
is
their unrealistic level of
arrogance
and greed!
They
knew I cannot afford any
expensive
legislative process,
no
matter whether truth is
on
my side or not,
-
and simply used it.
As
simple as that!
What do you expect from the court?
That it somehow announce the Barclays
bank has no debts to me?
But it has!
And the bank is perfectly aware of that!
That it somehow announce the Barclays
bank has no debts to me?
But it has!
And the bank is perfectly aware of that!
Barclays CEOs, you are uncapable to tell Good from Bad?
Is your high ranking job position suitable for infant children?
Then just GO!
That
is at least unethical.
The
main problem, however, is
they
SHIFTED responsibility
about
paying their debts,
to
other people.
Expenses
of the CEOs, including all legal fees,
are
to be paid by Barclays shareholders.
Mistakes
of Barclays lawyers
– by
the whole world!
Now
they all wait when I die
to
not pay any debts!
But
...
unless
I make a proper public announcement,
that
global collapse will last
FOREVER!
The
news of today is a SUPER URGENT need to deal with the mos recent
consequence of Barclays' derivative debts its CEOs created for me, -
cancellation of my contract with Mini-Storage company it declared
last week (see my letter to Barclays bank below) due to my unability
to pay its three monthly fee of $100 for each. I managed to make a
really inimaginable kind of miracle, - I paid for their service
during last THREE YEARS, despite being without any money at all,
including money for eating!
Moreover,
that company
is now going to bring to the court resolution of
my non-paying that fee to them I failed to make during last 3 months!
That is about $330 totally,
for paying of which professional Barclays lawyers remain modestly
shy. Its employees (many of whom obtained from Barclays more than
million pound each as salary last eyar only, let alone millions in
bonuses obtained by their CEO) could pay it a month or year ago. They
can pay it now. But they don't. Starting from generously paid
corporate lawyers, the Barclays CEOs are able to stop the process of
worsening my situation at any minute, - before Mini-Storage goes with
that debt to the court, accusing me in non-paying instead, - thus
preventing triggering
the chain of unreversable events that otherwise may destroy the whole
banking industry, as well as the law itself. But they don't! Instead,
they keep coldly watching from a “safe” distance whether I
resolve the problem they created years ago, pretending boldly they
have nothing to do with it now. Aha, aha ...
As
British scientists explained to HM the Queen, main reason for
financial crisis 2008 was people's failure “to see the whole
picture” for open information. The narrow minded Barclays' lawyers
definitely miss a similar whole picture for my case. And while it
might be forgivable for specialists with narrow (legal)
specialization, hired mostly for narrow tasks only, it can be a total
disaster for any company (the Barclays bank in my case) when its
CEOs, with corresponding super generous salary and bonuses, appear
sharing a similar level of ignorance. Here we can speak about the case when "missing the whole picture" is going to result in GLOBAL FINANCIAL COLLAPSE!
Meanwhile,
Translation:
"We
have broken our contract with you.
We
have not obtained payment for your debt to us.
If
you don't pay it now, we will apply to the Court."
Hey,
Barclays lawyers!
I
don't want to hear such things in my address.
The
debt they want from me was made
by
YOUR bank!
I
have no intention to deal with the shocking air of any court.
Why
should I?
I
NEVER BROKE THE LAW, REMEMBER?
But
not going to make the job for proving it for
free anymore!
Protect
me with your professionalism from any related problems.
I
DEMAND IT FROM YOU!
A
week ago I emailed to Barclays bank:
“Today,
the
Mini-Storage warns me
(Barclays/Swiss'
CEOs)
about
taking me
(Barclays/Swiss'
CEOs)
to
the court!
"Congratulations",
Barclays/Swiss'
CEOs
!!!
YOU
ARE MAKING ME
CRIMINAL?!!
Me,
who
Never
Broke The Law
before
dealing with you!
In
addition,
YOU
ARE FORCING ME TO BREAK THE LAW
IN
THE SPACE OF COMPLETE ABSENSE
OF
A PROPER LEGITIMATE JOB,
YOU
AND SWISS AUTHORITIES
HAVE
PUT ME IN.
STOP
IT
!!!
NOW!!!
I
DO NOT WANT
TO
BE A CRIMINAL!
Unlike you, I did not break any law.
The actions towards returning my debts is
100% LEGITIMATE!
***
Your problem, however,
Unlike you, I did not break any law.
The actions towards returning my debts is
100% LEGITIMATE!
***
Your problem, however,
becomes
bigger than
you
are able to imagine:
Barclays CEOs destroy world's Banking System.
Barclays Lawyers destroy the world's Law,
a foundation of any system. Thus putting
THE WHOLE WORLD
BEYOND THE LAW!
Barclays CEOs destroy world's Banking System.
Barclays Lawyers destroy the world's Law,
a foundation of any system. Thus putting
THE WHOLE WORLD
BEYOND THE LAW!
Do
you really expect I will discuss in International courts your
personal responsibility only? The biggest problem for you is Swiss
law does not envisage any (really?). And that means focusing my
claims on FUNDAMENTAL DOUBTS IN SWISS
AND INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATIVE SYSTEM PER SE!
Once again, I am
amazed by YOUR NAIVETY:
DO
YOU REALLY HOPE TO GET AWAY
FROM
PAYING YOUR DEBTS TO ME
IN
FULL?
EVER?!!”
Meanwhile,
a “bill” to Barclays lawyers/CEOs has grown to a
really UNLIMITED amount,
required for preventing Global Financial
Genocide I just proposed to
U.S. President. The Infinite Barclays' Debt to me would be quite
sufficient sum for this otherwise impossible payment.
As
non-doing anything when you can, in critical circumstances like my
exceptional case, is a crime in practically any legislative system
(see “INACTION
IS CRIMINAL ACTION!” , as well a good sourse for further
thinking in “Why
Jerusalem was destroyed”), it's evident the Barclays lwyers
have set up their CEOs extremely seriously! In turn, the later set
up their shareholders, and ultimately, ALL FINANCIAL ELITE OF THE
WORLD! Are
Barclays CEOs still keeping their dreamings about escaping any
responsibility after that?
At
the very beginning, Barclays CEOs “aptly” shifted to me their
responsibility for paying me their debt. Then they simply sat aside
and coldly watched how I was trying to do impossible, - to pay my
derivative debts, caused by their non-payment, from the sources that
did not exist. Namely, from other my savings, similar to the
Barclays' accounts they frozed (stolen) fraudulently. But I didn't
have any. The Barclays' savings accounts were the only my life
savings at the moment. In result, I had to sell my only place of
living, - a privately owned 4-rooms apartment at the center of Kiev,
UA, - for restoring the balance. Barclays CEOs were fully satisfied.
According
to their life logic,
I
had to pay their debts
INSTEAD
OF THEM,
SILENTLY,
WITHOUT
PROTEST,
and
that would be end of story.
It
looks like they use this approach for years, if not centuries.
So,
when I turned back and asked Barclays' partners for corresponding
refund, - INSTEAD OF Barclays bank!, - that seems appeared a complete
surprize for them all.
So,
the #1 fundamental
rule
openly
corrupted by Barclays lawyers
is EQUALITY
of all before the law:
Certain
group of rich people does not pay debts,
while
demanding that from the rest of the world!
In
turn, that is practicing 100% illegal DOUBLE LAW!
The #2 fundamental
rule
openly
compromised by Barclays lawyers is
undermining JUSTICE of
legislative system
without
which it would never be approved
by
majority of people!
#3:
The
Barclays bank turns any possible court on my case
into
a banal math of business transaction:
Money
for Justice, or
Justice
for Money!
Add
to it a
complete
Barclays' awareness of my
CONSTANTLY
SHOCKING STATE
OF
BEING AT THE EDGE OF LIFE
THEY
FORCE ME TO EXIST AT
DURING
LAST THREE YEARS:
Today
I'm literally
FALLING
FROM FATIGUE,
STARVATION,
and
DEADLY(!)
EXHAUSTED!
Ideal
condition for “FAIR”
competing
against
well
paid cheerful
Barclays
lawyers,
isn't
it?
The
only thing I am dreaming of
is
how to EAT enough, and
SLEEP enough!
Because
99% of my life time
I
am forced by Barclays CEOs
to
spend for solving just one
basic
problem that never
was
a problem for me
before
dealing with
Barclays
bank:
HOW
TO BE
A
L I V E !!!
And
the only fact behind it is
Barclays'
100% intentional
ABUSING
THE LAW!
And
that adds unprecedented
peculiarity
to what
I
AM CHARGING Barclays'
LAWYERS/CEOs
FOR
in
my case of their
STEALING my
money and
attempts
of KILLING me!
It
hardly could be different for the whole case
that
started from FORCING ME TO
BREAK
THE LAW
by
Barclays Lawyers(!)
under
silent approve
of
related CEOs,
incl.
HM The
Queen
!
Today,
I appeared because of that in
environment
where not breaking the
law
means DEATH OF HUNGER!
Swiss
SEM's Federal employees are
directly
involved in sending me to the
environment
by force, literally,
in
handcuffs!
And
I am CHARGING related CEOs
in
that too!
Look,
Barclays CEOs did their best to prevent me from getting my money. To
the degree of creating a situation in which it appeared IMPOSSIBLE!
That includes turning
the conventional way of resolving conflicts through the court into
completely IMPOSSIBLE for
me process (from
purely financial impossibility, due to being a citizen of the poorest
country of Europe, paired with related impossibility to obtain
British visa because of that financial impossibility, thus agreeing
for losing the case because of not appearing in the court physically-
to the practically unrealistic possibility to find any British judge
brave enough to officially announce bankruptcy of the whole UK, which
is a suggested court's decision in my particular case).
As
I already mentioned many times, Barclays CEOs were fully aware about
all above-mentioned factors, despite building and using completely
illegal INFO-WALL in
my case during 20 years!
Once
again, the main point for my case is that here we may speak about
intentional abusing the law & their own internal rules (they are
directly responsible for writing and updating of which) to achieve
that aim. They have been capable to implement transfer at any time,
but simply do not want to.
First
of all, Barclays lawyers refused to provide me with a full text of
those rules, or the laws they thought I broke. What else we can talk
about after that refusal? Legally, from this point any /claims/
references to the law are completely inappropriate and void!
The
CEOs refused to give me any written document signed by them
officially (let alone signed by me as representation of my explicit
concent with and acceptance of those rules that included information
on when EXACTLY they intend to return me my money in a particular
point of the Future. According to them, - FORMALLY NEVER! And that
fact alone causes serious questions about legitimacy of their main
rules.
Obviously,
such absence of clear answers for the subject (in fact,
totally illegal absence of promises of any
kind) was implemented by Barclays lawyers to make UNFAIR
IMBALANCE of responsibility in Barclays' favor. However, at the same
time, that thoughtfully implemented action was yet another evidence
of (a) full awareness about situation in my case, and (b) the fact of
existence of deliberate movement of Barclays CEOs in that direction.
But I am using the fact of intentional absence of any formal
responsibility for my case against Barclays bank! This is REVERSING
the problems they created for me in the opposite direction, -
directly towards Barclays CEOs and everybody who stands behind them!
It
took for Barclays bank 15 years just to accept that need
(unprecedented delay of banking service).
Once
again, as I mentioned above, I was agree to any possible way of
returning my money (in contrast to internal rules Barclays CEOs
enforced me to comply with without my explicit consent to it in
written) . When I first applied to Barclays bank, I was referred to
the main banking rules (namely, to general rules of banking industry
about fundamental obligation to return customer's money deposited to
savings accounts on his firts demand that Barclays bank
evidently abuses during
20 years(!). There existed 3 major ways for doing that (bank-to-bank
transfer, money transfer services from third parties, mailing a
cheque. And
guess what, Barclays CEOs managed to choose absolutely impossible one
(namely, third one).
The problem was, by the time it finally decided to implement that,
the third way of doing it did not work anyway. That appeared evident
all the bank wanted was closing my case formally only. And that alone
looks rather distractive, to say at least.
After
undermining the whole world's legislative system, the Barclays
lawyers and CEOs, charged in STEALING and permanent attempts of
KILLING, simply shifted their debt (which during unprecedented in
banking industry interruption of service for 20 years became
INFINITE) to Bank Of England, HM The Queen, American Fed, and the
whole world, suggest resolving my case through the court only?!!
You
pi*sed off this opportunity,
Barclays
lawyers and CEOs!
You
pi*sed off everything!!!
Now
you need to
pay
for this
BY
YOUR OWN SAVINGS!
So,
what Barclays staff expect to hear from the court? Rather, they hope
there will be no court on the matter, ever. Or they hope the court is
capable to announce procedure of creating Barclays' Infinite Debt to
me illegal? Forget about
that! Corresponding details have
never been discussed in public in full. But everything was done
properly, in full correspondance to what was possible to do. Anyway,
Barclays lawyers are going to face many surprises in the courtroom.
Until
proving the opposite, my BMoney will remain completely legitimate.
FOREVER!
I
am not afraid of any court. My main point is the truth is on my side!
The only way for Barclays lawyers to win it is through creating for
me FRAUDULENTLY UNFAIR conditions for competition in the court.
Difference in financing corresponding legal battle is one of them.
And that is morally DISGUSTING!
From
my part, I also see no need for hurrying about resolving my case in
the court. Why should I? The well paid Barclays lawyers have built a
convenient space for themselves to win any legal case. I see no
reason to play this game on their field.
BEYOND
SPACE OF LAW!
Thus
they put all world's laws,
the
whole legislative system,
BEYOND
THE LAW TOO!
They
broke fundamental banking rules, as well semi-official so called Sea
(Admiralty)
Laws, and the failure of Barclays lawyers/CEOs becomes 100% evident!
Today,
the only question is whether resulting financial crisis
is REVERSABLE,
- and who exactly in top Barclays management team is going to PAY for
the resulting BGate scandal.
My
demands for Barclays bank have not changed for years (why should
they?), including
URGENT
demand for starting corresponding settlement process from sending me
firsrt money tranche through Western Union instant payment system to
my name (Sergiy Beloy) to Ukraine IMMEDIATELY!
The
main result of activity of
Barclays
lawyers in my case
appeared,
however, a
FATAL
UNDERMINING
OF
THE CURRENT
LEGISLATIVE
SYSTEM!
See
more in my articles about
related Collapse
of Swiss Law.
Instead,
I am going to resolve the issues created by Barlays bank through
going beyond that tricky box called legislative system. In
particular, through starting my own MEGA
MEDIA CAMPAIGN! Nobody
can be forbidden to demand his debts, EVER! And that activity
is COMPLETELY
LEGITIMATE!!!
As
for legitimacy
of my BMoney,
- it's nearly the same as the one for all other kinds of modern money
in circulation (by the way, 95% of which simply does not exists in
reality). In a way, - it's PERFECT!
No comments:
Post a Comment